Again this weekend we saw
articles published declaring that the Federal government was making “obscene
profits” through the Federal student loan program. This assertion is based upon the forecast
published by the Congressional Budget Office that estimated the Federal
government would record profits in excess of $50B on its loan portfolio – making
it more profitable than Exxon Mobil. As
an individual who works and reviews the Federal student loan portfolio every day,
I find these assertions a little bizarre because the Federal student loan
program is not making money, it is losing money. A lot of money. In this post, I will outline how faulty
accounting creates the illusion of profits in the student loan portfolio by
reviewing the actual cash flow data within the Federal loan portfolio.
The disparity between CBO
forecasts and the reality of the Federal student loan pool is a difference between
non-cash accounting and real cash flow. In
the case of student loans, this is the difference between a loan that is in
deferment and accruing interest versus a loan that is in repayment and is
actually making cash payments. Currently,
the Federal government does not make a distinction between the two: a loan that
has never made a payment and accrued interest for five years is considered
equally profitable as a loan that has made full payments over the same five
year period. To demonstrate how big of
an issue this is, let’s turn once again to the Sallie Mae asset backed
securities data (I prefer Sallie Mae data because it is audited independently
and any faulty accounting comes with legal liability to Sallie Mae and her
shareholders).
The figure above is a summary of several
Sallie Mae student loan trusts. Let me
quickly review the data that I am summarizing.
First, we start with the “Pool Balance”, which is the total outstanding balance
of all the loans in the trust. In the
case of the SLM 2010_2 trust, there are ~130,000 loans with a total notional
value of ~$525 million. The “WAC” is the
“Weighted Average Coupon” and represents the average interest rate on the loans
in the portfolio. Multiplying these two
figures together produces the “Implied Interest”, which represents the
contractual interest that accrues on the loan pool each year. Notably, these are all purely accounting
figures and do not represent the actual cash flows within the portfolio.
We start seeing the actual cash
flows from the portfolio as we move down to Payment Data. “Borrower Interest” represents actual cash
interest payments made by borrowers against their loans. “Guarantor Interest” represents cash interest
payments made by the Department of Education in place of students who defaulted
on their loans, and “Other Interest” represents several other relatively small
payments made to reconcile interest payments.
The sum of these three categories represents the “Cash Interest” paid by
the portfolio of loans. Next, “Negative
Amortization” represents the non-cash interest that has accrued on outstanding
loans that are in some form of deferment or forbearance – that is, loans that
are accruing interest but not making any actual cash payments. The sum of these figures is the “Total
Interest”, which reconciles (approximately) with the Implied Interest we
previously calculated.
There are a couple things that
immediately stick out in this data.
First, of all the interest that is accruing in the loan pool only half
of it is being paid in cash, while the remainder is non-cash negative
amortization. This is not necessarily
disastrous for a student loan portfolio as every loan goes through a negative
amortization period while the borrower is in school. What is alarming about the Federal loan
portfolio is that this negative amortization trend continues even after students
are graduating: in the 2010_2 portfolio less than 6% of the portfolio is still
in school but 50% of the interest payments are non-cash. The problem is even more revealing in older
portfolios like the 2006_3 trust, which is comprised of loans that were made to
borrowers who were students at least seven years ago. In the 2006_3 pool less than 2% of the loans
are still in school, and yet nearly 60% of the interest payments are non-cash
negative amortization!
And what about those individuals
who are making payments; those filed under “Current” loan status? First, they make up just 50% of the total
loan pool – meaning that half of all borrowers in the Federal loan portfolio
are not current on their obligations. Second,
there are some alarming trends even in these “successful” borrowers. Notably, the introduction of Income Based
Repayment and other partial payment programs means that borrowers can stay “Current”
on their obligations but still be making payments that are less than the interest
accruing on their loans. We can see
evidence of this trend in the “Return” column of the Loan Status block. This figure represents the Cash Interest
amount divided by the outstanding amount of Current loans. If each current borrower were making full
payments on their obligations, then this figure would roughly equal the WAC on
the total loan portfolio; if this figure is meaningfully less than the WAC,
then that means that more Current borrowers are making only partial payments
and still accruing interest on their loans.
What we see is that the Current borrowers in the older loan pools (from
2008 and 2006) are making full or near full payments on their obligations;
however, Current borrowers on newer loans (2010) are not making anything close
to full payments. In fact, only 70% of
the interest accruing on Current loans is being paid in cash, the other 30% is
accruing as negative amortization. So,
for the 2010_2 pool of loans, just 37% of borrowers are Current and just 70% of
those borrowers are making full interest payments on their loans – to say
nothing about actually repaying the principal balance.
So, to return to our initial
question, is the Federal loan pool really generating a profit? One way to answer that question would be to
look at the Cash Interest Return; that is, the total Cash Interest divided by
the Pool Balance. We see that the Cash
Interest Return is hovering somewhere around 2.0% for these loan pools. We can compare that to the Treasury’s ten
year borrowing rate, which currently sits at a historic low of 2.2%. At this point you might ask yourself: If the
Treasury is borrowing at 2.2% and only getting 2.0% in return, then how are
they making a profit? The reality is
that the Federal student loan portfolio is producing accounting profits
but real
losses.
Thanks Asset
ReplyDeleteAsset Connectors is one of the top choices utilized to locate owners with our state-of-the-art location tools which successfully locate individual owners, and business contacts for business. asset connectors
Are you need loan? If your need cash then communication or contact with us. Get Payday Loans, Check Cashing & Cash Advances in Davenport at Hometown Cash Advance. Great rates, call us at 563-324-4700Payday Loans Davenport
ReplyDeleteyou want an answer for creating the phone ring, however nice promoting goes farther than that. You’d wish to boost your image while not breaking the bank. You’d like far more referrals (actually pretty straightforward if you recognize the phrase to use.contractor marketing for more information.
ReplyDeleteWhen someone considers starting a profitable business or expanding his existing one, one option to achieve his goals is to apply for such a loan. The benefits, terms, and rates are very different among the different financial institutions.Adam Mortgage has utilized the power of advanced technology to streamline the mortgage approval process to help close loans in a fast and efficient manner.mortgage companies in Houston
ReplyDeleteIf you are looking for a positive lending experience I would recommend Le_Meridian Funding Service. It is surprisingly easy to receive a debt help. You will be treated with respect and professionalism Because they helped me with loan too @ 1.9% ROI. Email Contact..lfdsloans@lemeridianfds.com
ReplyDelete